Accessibility and Inclusion decolonization Diversity Equity Museopunks Podcast Tech

Changing the Canon – American Alliance of Museums

Changing the Canon – American Alliance of Museums

Museum collections in established establishments include lengthy histories. So how do you modify a museum’s canon? On this episode, we converse with Christopher Bedford, Dorothy Wagner Wallis Director of The Baltimore Museum of Artwork, about the BMA’s choice in early 2018 to deaccession seven works by blue-chip artists in the modern assortment to be able to strengthen its holdings of modern works by ladies and artists of shade.

By no means miss an episode! Subscribe to Museopunks on iTunes or Stitcher


Headshot of Christopher Bedford standing outside wearing a blue suit and brown tie.Christopher Bedford is the Dorothy Wagner Wallis Director of The Baltimore Museum of Artwork. Acknowledged as an progressive and dynamic chief for constructing larger group engagement and creating packages of nationwide and worldwide influence, Bedford served as director of the Rose Artwork Museum at Brandeis College for 4 years previous to becoming a member of the BMA and was just lately Commissioner for the U.S. Pavilion for the 2017 Venice Biennale. Beforehand, Bedford held the positions of chief curator and curator of exhibitions at the Wexner Middle for the Arts at The Ohio State College.  Born in Scotland and raised in the United States and the UK, Bedford has a Bachelor of Arts from Oberlin School, acquired a grasp’s diploma in artwork historical past via the joint program at Case Western Reserve College and the Cleveland Museum of Artwork, and has studied in the doctoral packages in artwork historical past at the College of Southern California and the Courtauld Institute of Artwork at the College of London. Bedford can also be a famous writer and contributor to publications together with Artwork in America, ArtForum, and Frieze, amongst others.

Present Notes

Creating worth round ladies artists: the chief curator’s view

Artwork World Heavyweights ‘Stupefied’ by Sexist Museum Firings

It’s 2018. Why Can’t Museums Let Feminine Curators Do Their Jobs?

The BMA Diversifies Its Assortment, Strengthening Its Holdings to Improve Customer Expertise

Mark Bradford: Tomorrow Is One other Day

Presenting Sponsor

Museopunks is introduced by the American Alliance of Museums.

Graphic Design of the Museopunks emblem is by Selena Robleto.

Web site:

Twitter: @museopunks


Suse Anderson: Good day, and welcome to Museopunks the podcast for the progressive museum. My identify is Suse Anderson. And that is our ultimate episode for the yr and certainly for our second season, however what a yr it’s been, this time final yr I used to be nonetheless adjusting to being a brand new mother. When Jeffrey Inscho, my former co-host informed me he was going to be leaving the sector to attempt one thing new. It was a bit of terrifying to get that information, however I’m actually grateful for the years that we had working collectively on the podcast, and for his generosity in gifting me Museopunks to proceed on with out him. Though his departure was the one I felt most keenly in my life comings and goings in sector have typically appear to be factors of inflection this yr that spoke to greater problem proper throughout the museum subject, a quantity of outstanding ladies and administrators and curators have been fired or resigned this yr when dealing with hostile boards or management, who particularly didn’t help the work they have been doing to redress imbalances in the canon to champion the work of artists from marginalized and excluded communities and to offer inclusive programming.

This concept of institutional change isn’t straightforward one once we come throughout it, often in our discussions on this podcast, nevertheless it’s been so essential and take notice of the place these struggles truly play out. In a 2016 interview with the newspaper Helen Molesworth, who was one of these outstanding ladies who was fired, notes that the majority museums to take care of a dedication to an concept of the greatest or high quality or genius. I’m not saying I don’t agree with these as values, however I feel these values have been created over a whole lot of years to favor white males. One of the issues you need to say as a curator is, we aren’t going to current the worth that already exists. We’re going to do the work to create worth round these ladies artists, and artists of colour that may simply come naturally to the white male artist.

This can be a dialog we’ve been having so much in my museum historical past and principle class course that I taught throughout the fall semester at GW. Each week, my college students and I might wrestle with the historical past, the concepts, and the paradoxes which have given form to museum follow as we all know it immediately. And these questions of normative values or values which might be understood as pure or proper, people who exist and start to take type as the canon have emerged over time. As we think about them, we actually had to consider how and why issues grow to be considered museum-quality objects, and far of this as we talk about a bit of bit in at present’s episode is a legacy of an imbalanced historical past inside our sector. Regardless of this, regardless of this historical past, there are various establishments which are making vital efforts to redress the stability of objects on show and to vary the canon.

In as we speak’s episode, we take a look at one museum’s efforts to do exactly that. Is a museum very near my coronary heart. It was simply over two years since I left the Baltimore Museum of Artwork to hitch GW. And one of my few regrets from that transfer was that I didn’t have an opportunity to work with Christopher Bedford, the BMA’s director who began solely a pair of weeks after my departure. And since Chris arrived at the BMA, I’ve witnessed big modifications inside the museum from its programming and exhibition schedule by means of its hiring practices. These modifications have been no accident. So right now, we’ll discover out extra about them and ask if, and the way, an establishment can change its canon.

Christopher Bedford is the Dorothy Wagner Wallace Director of the Baltimore Museum of Artwork acknowledged as an progressive and dynamically to for constructing higher group engagement and artistic packages of nationwide and worldwide impression. Bedford served as director of the Rose Artwork Museum at Brandeis College for 4 years previous to becoming a member of the BMA. It was lately commissioned for the US pavilion of the 2017 Venice Biennale. Beforehand, Bedford held the positions of Chief Curator and curator of exhibitions at the Wexner Middle for the Arts at Ohio State College. Born in Scotland and raised in the United States and the UK, Bedford has a Bachelor of Arts from Oberlin School, acquired a grasp’s diploma in artwork historical past by way of the joint program at Case Western Reserve College and Cleveland Museum of Artwork. And has studied in the doctoral packages in artwork historical past at the College of Southern California and the Courtauld Institute of Artwork at the College of London.

Bedford can also be a famous writer and contributor to publications together with Artwork in America, Artwork Discussion board and Freize amongst others. Chris, welcome to Museopunks.

Christopher Bedford: These very good to be right here.

Suse:     It’s so good to have you ever right here. So that you began at the BMA in August 2016, which was two weeks after I left which, for me ….

Christopher: It’s tragedy ….

Suse:     Completely was. It truly one of my massive regrets from, once I left the BMA was that we didn’t have an opportunity to work collectively. However from taking a look at the establishment in these years because you’ve joined, it looks like a special establishment to me. It’s totally different in phrases of its exhibitions. It’s totally different in phrases of its programming. Once I take into consideration the staffing and the dynamics of the audiences right here, they really feel totally different too. So that you clearly noticed a very massive alternative right here at BMA earlier than you arrived. Are you able to speak slightly bit about what introduced you to this museum and why you have been impressed by it?

Christopher: Completely. I’ll return a bit bit to my very own historical past to reply the query. I feel I’ve been in numerous totally different context the place social justice, fairness, inclusion have been variously articulated as the priorities for the establishments, all the approach again to say Oberlin School which is the first school to confess African People, the first school to confess ladies and stuff on the Underground Railroad nonetheless a really radical context for political thought. I feel that’s in all probability studying artwork historical past there, conditioned me to consider discovering context that basically want differing types of work accomplished.

I might additionally say that being the director of the Rose at Brandeis College, which has an extremely robust social basis rooted in the Jewish religion, and the want to make use of constructive forces to form a greater world frankly. We tried to include that philosophy of new world making right into a museum’s program by means of exhibitions and acquisitions so a reasonably pure step for me was to attempt to discover a civic museum in a location that required the establishment to vary its rhetoric, change its face, flip itself inside out to serve that group. So, in interested by what my transition can be inside the museum subject. I used to be looking for precisely this. So as to add a layer, I feel that is drawing alone historical past working with artists. I feel that the most essential pertinent topical work being made as we speak is being made by an increasing group of black People, intergenerational group of black People starting from the lately deceased, Jack Whitten however then additionally Sam Gilliam, Howardena Pindell, Mel Edwards all nonetheless dwelling. After which again by way of type of center generations and youthful generations, Mark Bradford Mickaenel Thomas, Kara Walker, others who have been proposing the artwork isn’t simply an concept of change, it’s change itself.

What does that seem like in a spot like Baltimore, which is a black majority metropolis? So you’ve got this extremely necessary artistic area and these artists. You could have a black majority metropolis that hasn’t all the time felt at house in a museum like the BMA, which is over a century previous. So how do you’re taking these two elements, put them collectively and alter an establishment so as to change a metropolis? That’s what we’re making an attempt to do.

Suse:     It’s been actually fascinating. I feel one of the largest modifications that I’ve observed since being right here is, the mission and a imaginative and prescient are totally different. I’ve a replica of them so I’m going to learn them out. The BMA’s new mission states that the Baltimore Museum of Artwork connects artwork to Baltimore and Baltimore to the world embodying a dedication to inventive excellence and social fairness in each determination, from our presentation, interpretation and accumulating to the composition of our board of trustees, employees and volunteers, making a museum welcoming to all. The brand new imaginative and prescient proposes that the BMA is looking for to be the most related publicly engaged Museum in the United States. The dynamic mannequin for all others.

Suse:     That is massively formidable. Are you able to speak about the course of of arriving at that new mission and that new imaginative and prescient, and the way you bought to actually such an formidable agenda for the museum?

Christopher: Sure. We embarked lately on a strategic planning course of. And I’ve to say that my strategies of considering and doing are utterly anathema to planning, I don’t like that course of in any respect. However, I discovered that basically richly rewarding. It has been led by a mixture of employees and board. That core has remained intact all through the complete planning course of, and it was carried out at a really deliberate dash in order that it might really feel very motion oriented and half of these phases and creating what a brand new BMA would appear to be, rewriting our self-description, which is the mission and the imaginative and prescient. And I feel, I needed to depart from these cookie cutter descriptions of different encyclopedic museums and totally different civic contexts. I used to be averse to the concept that a museum in a special metropolis might be described utilizing the similar paragraph as the civic museum.

I needed to make it stridently distinct, they usually need to embrace the values which might be going to information us in the subsequent three to 5 years. Which is what led to that language, which I haven’t learn in a while. So it’s good to listen to you recite and it does seize our course.

Suse:     I feel it seems like a dwelling mission and imaginative and prescient to me. And it does appear as I’ve mirrored it in the museum, it feels actual to me and I feel that’s what, one of the causes it’s so fascinating to me. To select up one factor from it. You speak about the composition of the board of trustees, and of course, I do know that’s one thing museums are sometimes occupied with of how you modify the composition of these organizations which might be so invested in the establishment and have histories of their very own are. What’s been the course of for that?

Christopher: Nicely, I might say that change on this scale is simply actual when you enact it systemically. So I don’t assume its okay simply to do one exhibition right here and there and name it a day. I feel the approach if there’s one thing that differentiates the work that the BMA has achieved over the previous 18 months. It’s the proven fact that we now have dedicated to doing extraordinary work inside a really, not narrowly outlined vary, however type of a ruthlessly targeted vary of exercise. The best way I take into consideration that change is in 5 totally different buckets… its collections, which means principally acquisitions, exhibitions, public packages, employees, and board. Should you put these items of the puzzle collectively, that basically is the totality of the establishment from the inside out and from the outdoors in. That’s the idea. Each one of these classes has to shift to satisfy the new model.

We have now a public program collection, Requirements of Tomorrow, for example, that’s about fairness, entry, social justice by means of the work and ideas about us. We now have, you already know our artwork deaccessioning course of, which I’m positive we’re going to speak about.

Suse:     We’re certainly.

Christopher: Our exhibition schedule is, I feel fairly self-evident. The board is now, absolutely one third “people of color,” which is a considerable victory, truly for our governance committee who actually drives these efforts. That’s been extraordinary, and we’re making nice inroads with employees with a specific give attention to curators. I feel the one that is most eloquent on the topic is Darren Walker of the Ford Basis. I’ve heard him converse many occasions, and we take pleasure in his consideration and his advocacy too. He talks very persuasively about the have to diversify museums at the highest degree of governance, particularly the board. You’ll be able to’t enact change that sticks until that governing entity modifications.

Suse:     Yeah, completely. I might agree 100% from the conversations I’ve had for this podcast. That appears to be a very essential theme that has continued by way of, we talked about deaccessioning, I’ll say, let’s speak collections. I need to speak about the way you’ve written about the assortment and the imaginative and prescient. You already know that it is going to be a compelling assortment for the 21st century, socially related cutting-edge acquisitions, exhibitions, and packages, will lead the approach each regionally and globally. And historic accuracy, benefit, and fairness will turn out to be the foundation for a brand new canon throughout a museum. Once more, it’s extremely dynamic language. One of the ways in which you’ve determined to do that was by promoting seven works by white male blue-chip artists like Andy Warhol and Robert Rauschenberg, to fund works by ladies and other people of shade. Are you able to inform us, the place this got here from? Why this was the proper answer.

Christopher: Once more, it has to do with the particular website of Baltimore, the mission that we’ve set for ourselves, the want to correctly interact the group to characterize that group inside the partitions of the museum. And to acknowledge, this can be a black majority metropolis. It has been historically a white majority establishment, so these issues clearly don’t align to supply a brand new conception of viewers. We needed to make a change in our acquisition coverage, simply as we have been making a change in our exhibition coverage, simply as we’re making a change in the approach that we go about hiring and populating the board of trustees. I feel a pair of issues, simply to border the dialog. We did truly go about the deaccessioning course of in the actually, step-by-step conservative trend. That aligns exactly with AAMD’s mandates for deaccessioning

We have been taking a look at duplication and triplication, we have been taking a look at storage legal responsibility. We have been taking a look at poor high quality. We have been taking a look at objects that had been on view very occasionally from the time they enter the assortment to the current. And people issues that didn’t advance the story that we needed to inform. That’s the normative standards for any deaccessioning. So, every one of these seven objects met that standards, after which some. In fact, I did need to take a look at objects of appreciable worth as properly. As a result of if we have been going to step via this course of, we would have liked to accrue a kind of warfare chest to vary the establishment and to be aggressive in the market. That of course, was an enormous half of it. And I didn’t need to in any means endanger the fame of the establishment by going too far. So it turned actually essential to go step-by-step.

Suse:     What have you ever completed with the funds from promoting off these works?

Christopher: Properly, we’ve now completed the course of of sale, we work with Sotheby’s. Some of it was accomplished via public sale, some of it was achieved by means of personal sale, simply as a consequence of the scale of the objects they usually have been higher suited to be bought privately. I feel the actually fascinating factor earlier than I inform you what we did with the proceeds is that, in speaking with press particularly about this follow, they stated, “so you sold off the work of seven white men and you’re buying all works by women of all sorts of color” and I stated, nicely, that’s completely true and I do see your want to sensationalize it that means. However I additionally need to say that, in the event you’re in search of a mixture of high quality and redundancy inside the museum assortment and, additionally worth, that may inevitably lead you to the work of white males.

Christopher: That was not by design. It’s the design of the assortment that if, as I say to invoke Darren Walker once more, he would say that, “the composition of a museum, writ large is a consequence of the way this country was formed, around transatlantic slave trade.” I imply, that every part types round that social foundation. And so, when you acknowledge that actuality, darkish and damaging as it’s it permits you to then assume clearly about strategies for altering the current. In fact the assortment is heavy on the high-value blue-chip work by white males, of course, that stands to cause. So it wasn’t by design, and it wasn’t meant to sensationalize, it’s a consequence of historical past. What we’re trying to do with the deaccessioning with these proceeds, is sort of actually proper the ship. We’re writing a special artwork historical past that’s based mostly on benefit and fairness. It’s based mostly on analysis and what truly occurs traditionally and never based mostly on prejudice. There’s individuals who contributed to the historical past of artwork however haven’t been written into it. That’s our foundation.

We’ve bought a spread of issues. One I’ll level to right away the very first thing that we dedicated to the second, we had the proceeds was Jack Whitten’s excessive masterpiece 911, which is from 2006, and I can speak about that at barely extra size then some of the different issues perhaps if that’s of curiosity.

Suse:     I imply, I feel it’s actually pretty simply listening to about the thought processes behind these. I feel much more than particular work, though extra so like particular work, is usually have this stuff play out.

Christopher: Nicely, we needed masterpieces, not examples that have been an actual foundation right here. So Jack Whitten’s 911, was an excellent instance, Amy Cheryl’s extraordinary Planes, Rockets, and the Areas in Between by means of 2018. So Amy can also be the individual chargeable for Michelle Obama’s portrait of course. Shifting in Radical New Instructions. A number of Figures, a sort of American realism from the 2000 to 2018- 2019 interval. Wangechi Mutu’s bronze sculpture Water Lady which is, I feel has the capability to grow to be iconic in relationship to the museum’s new turning into. After which one other fabulous instance is Julien Issac’s, three-channel video set up in Baltimore, which appeared that needed to reside on this museum.

Suse:     I’m truly actually interested in then, how a lot native artists are additionally forming half of this as a result of a lot of that is about eager about the area people the place native artists match into this.

Christopher: It is a gigantic half. One factor I’ll say about Baltimore, and I’ve by no means had this experiences as museum professionals is that, outdoors of New York and Los Angeles, I can interact actually deeply meaningfully with work being produced in Baltimore with out there being a sliver of compromise in high quality. Or the mandate that we gather and present work that’s topical, being socially engaged. From, say, Steven Cities to Amy Sherald, to Melvin Edwards, who now spends greater than half of this time yearly in Baltimore. We now have an unimaginable group of largely black American painters and sculptors, though some working in the shifting picture as properly whose missions as artists are virtually exactly aligned with the one which we’ve assigned for ourselves as an establishment. That ought to come as no shock as a result of I feel the context of Baltimore is shaping their self-imposed mandates as artists. Shinique Smith, is one other nice instance, an artist who’s born and bred in Baltimore. And she or he says that her rhetoric as an artist is unimaginable with out the metropolis.

Suse:     It’s this pretty type of cycle that’s been stated, that the BMA can truly really feel that and vice versa …

Christopher: Sure, completely so.

Suse:     I’m curious once more, fascinated by this concept of altering the canon as a result of I feel that is once more, a very formidable factor. In the imaginative and prescient, it talks about altering the canon throughout the museum. Is that this one thing that may scale out? Are we even fascinated with how different establishments may also change this canon? Is that this a tactic for different establishments to undertake as they consider altering their canon?

Christopher: I imply, I feel like each different museum director, I take a look at relevant fashions in several establishments, and I attempt to steal the elements of these fashions that may work right here. Use the Frankenstein in your personal museum, based mostly on the greatest practices of others, and a few invention of your personal. I do assume that one of the causes to have these conversations or go to conferences and current on the deaccessioning, or diversification or, any of these interrelated topics is to create a replicable roadmap for others. I feel sustainable change with the new museum is one factor, I feel creating the hope of sustainable change in others is one other factor of large worth. I all the time joke giving these talks, it looks like we had a plan in the retelling. I might say that we didn’t precisely have a plan. We had a conviction, and a want to vary in a spread of totally different locations. And so, when introduced with a selection, we attempt to make the proper one.

Suse:     That’s an fascinating concept. So one of the issues I’ve been fascinated with this deaccessioning, and this concept of shifting the canon, is definitely whether or not by recirculating these artworks, if something, it type of reinforces the present canon as a result of it places works again into circulation, and whether or not that really has influence on questions round desirability and entry to those blue-chip works as nicely. As one of the issues that I’m making an attempt to grapple with this concept of, this mannequin working at scale is, might this deaccessioning truly shifted the canon as a result of it shifts worth for ladies artists, artists of shade completely. However does it additionally reinvigorate some of the market round these blue-chip artists?

Christopher: As a result of presumably, personal collectors would then see a chance as a result of museums are shifting in a unique path. That’s undoubtedly attainable. What I’ll say is, in case you take a look at market developments over the final couple of years, and the means that say, Mark Bradford is acting at public sale, Kerry James Marshall one other unimaginable instance, the approach that business galleries are starting to emphasise women and men of shade and their rosters. The world is altering in recognition of a brand new set of priorities that I feel are being institutionally decided. Now, we solely take part in the market to the extent that we like everyone else purchase and add to our assortment, in the means that meet our calls for and mission. In that sense, I feel museums are nonetheless actually instrumental in establishing worth at the highest degree, by committing our scholarship, our time, our assets, and most significantly, in all probability area on the wall. As a result of nothing says essential, fairly like the choice to purchase at the everlasting assortment and put it on everlasting show. To me, we’re redefining worth by taking that step.

Suse:     That’s actually thrilling. You talked about one of the issues that you’ve been doing, can also be altering the staffing profile, notably in a curatorial space. How are you seeing that then have an effect on choice making in phrases of the establishment? Having individuals from totally different curatorial backgrounds, I’m assuming needs to be making large influence internally round discussions in the museum.

Christopher: I imply, completely. I feel we’re hiring artistic minds to gasoline the museum. People who find themselves, clearly disposed to the mission that we’ve set for ourselves. That’s an crucial. However I’m an enormous … After which, I feel this is a gigantic conviction. In the event you collect the proper individuals in the room with an emphasis on a variety of views, you develop the most compelling program. It’s truly distinction that produces high quality.  And I feel in virtually each subject of analysis, from social science to physics to only, the make-up of a boardroom, you’ll discover that a selection of views will all the time outstrip a sort of extra monolithic construction. We’ve tried to embrace that as a construction for our mind belief. And I feel the extra distinction there’s in the room, the higher our program will probably be and it’s working.

Suse:     Yeah, that’s implausible. What’s arising subsequent for you, as you then take into consideration the modifications? You’ve executed an enormous quantity in two years. What do you need to obtain over the subsequent two years or 5 years at popping out of this type of shifting mission?

Christopher: I need to empower the curators that we’ve employed to be the artistic brokers that we imagined. I need to proceed aggressively including to the everlasting assortment and putting in it in ways in which remake the BMA’s new house, a brand new consultant house for Baltimore. I need to proceed to make exhibitions that change the method we take into consideration the canon. A superb instance of that might be a Joan Mitchell retrospective that we’re co-organizing with SFMOMA, which has an enormous and substantial tour. That to me is a very profound extension of the mission of the establishment. So she, in the view of many students, is the biggest gestural painter this nation has produced since de Kooning, and but the quantity of retrospectives given to Joan Mitchell, versus Jackson Pollock, tells you the whole lot you want to find out about the means prejudice has structured artwork historical past.

So thrusting her contributions into the international limelight, I feel is a unprecedented alternative.

Suse:     Yeah, completely. One ultimate query, earlier than I allow you to go, I’ve spoken a quantity of occasions about how a lot I can see the distinction over two years. How a lot has the tempo of change been essential to how a lot you’ve been capable of get carried out as a result of it seems like a lot? And I’m wondering if truly, the want to only get in and make change in a short time has additionally enabled you to make such a scale of change?

Christopher: Completely. I feel it’s a very intentionally not risk-averse method of making change. I feel we need to transfer quick with the expectation that there’ll sometimes be a mistake however the positive aspects shall be innumerable as a consequence. I feel that museums impose a sort of, a man-made metabolism on themselves and that we now have all the time been capable of transfer far more shortly than we’ve demonstrated. I feel that Baltimore’s been ready for a really, very, very very long time. The conviction of the employees and the board that we’re not going to make the metropolis wait any longer. Transfer quick as a result of we will.

Suse:     Yeah, implausible. Chris, If individuals do need to discover out somewhat bit extra about this work or in the event that they’re truly fascinated by following together with what the BMA is doing, the place can they discover out?

Christopher: They will discover out on all of our social media platforms, they will discover out on our web sites. I feel we is probably not a full account of each exhibition that’s forthcoming, however the program between 2019 and say 2021, is extraordinary. And encapsulates each worth we’ve mentioned.

Suse:     That’s unbelievable, Chris, I’ll put hyperlinks to all of these issues in the present notes. It has been an absolute pleasure. Thanks a lot for becoming a member of us.

Christopher: Thanks very a lot.

Suse:     Oh, that’s nice.

Thanks, Christopher. It has been actually fantastic watching the evolution of this museum that I care about so deeply considerably unexpectedly. The BMA has turn out to be one of my most common hangouts with the kiddo as a result of it’s an enormous area she will type of run round in and with free entry. We’ve been going to the BMA virtually weekly since the climate turned chilly right here in Baltimore. Now engaged on this podcast and having the conversations it has allowed me to have has been an enormous privilege, and I’m grateful to have the alternative to proceed it. I need to say a pair of thanks as I wrap-up the season. An enormous thanks to Dean Phelus, Cecelia Partitions, Megan Lantz, Elizabeth Merritt and Robert Stein at AAM, for his or her continued help of Museopunks. Would additionally wish to thank all of my visitors, co-hosts, and everybody who shared their ideas and concepts with me for the present. It’s truthfully one of the biggest pleasures that I’ve to get to have these conversations and achieve this in public in ways in which different individuals get to listen to the responses as properly.

I’m actually grateful to you, my listeners for persevering with to pay attention and to help me and to get in touch when there’s issues that excite you or issues that you simply want me to dig into deeper. As the yr wraps up, I’m going to take a pair of weeks off to plan for the subsequent season. So don’t anticipate to listen to from me for a short while. However I sit up for catching up with you in 2019 to discover extra of progressive follow in museums. Museopunks is introduced each month by the American Alliance of Museums. You possibly can join with me on Twitter at Museopunks. Or take a look at the prolonged present notes at Museopunks dot org. And of course, you possibly can subscribe anytime at iTunes or Stitcher. Hope you have got an awesome finish of 2018.